(1) The experimenter has one key word set.
The Null hypothesis is that
this key word set is not encoded; that is, there is no Torah code effect
for this key word set. The Null hypothesis says that the ELSs of this key
word set, under the given experimental protocol, are in random arrangement
as might be expected in a monkey text. The Alternative hypothesis is that
the ELSs of this key word set, under the given experimental protocol, are
in a more compact arrangement than expected by chance.
(2) The experimenter has one event with multiple key word sets.
Here the key word sets most likely have some common words and they are
therefore not independent sets. The Null hypothesis says that each of these
key word sets has, under the given experimental protocol, ELSs in a random
arrangement as might be expected in a monkey text. The Alternative hypothesis
is that one [at least one] of these key word sets, under the given experimental protocol has
ELSs in a more compact arrangement than expected by chance.
(3) The experimenter has multiple events each with multiple key word sets.
Here the key word sets associated with the same event most likely have some
common words and they are therefore not independent sets. The Null hypothesis
says that each of the events has all of its key word sets having ELSs in a
random arrangement as might be expected in a monkey text. The Alternative
hypothesis is that, under the experimental protocol,
all but one of these events have at least
one of their key word sets having ELSs in a more compact arrangement than expected
by chance.
Technical Discussion:
Designing The Test Statistic